While perusing some of the blogs I frequent, and the discussion of "say one thing, do/be another", I just have to wonder if this really surprises anyone? We've been getting this crap in full force since (before) 2000!
Originally coming from the New York Times,
"Supreme Court nominees present themselves one way at confirmation hearings but act differently on the court" in which they are "too carefully packaged and coached on how to duck all of the hard questions", I have to ask, what "hard questions"? When have these lying sob's had to really face (or answer) any hard questions?
Because isn't that what this is all basically about? The proverbial 'blowing sunshine up (some)one's ass' for a job? Telling the 'people' what they want to hear, knowing they have no intention of doing it?
Hello?
From Bush's first campaign, (from before that actually, but that is an entirely similar but different tangent) this has been their standard method of operation! Cheney really wasn't from Wyoming; only has a ranch there (albeit a very beautiful one, I'm sure!); and Bush is far from being a moderate (let alone intelligent)!
But if one needs more references here they are and feel free to add any that were missed! I'm sure the drough is as large as middle eastern oil reserves!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment