It's no wonder that I am sceptical about the longevity of the human condition. Please allow me to explain.
It has been proven several times in our history (both written and in lore), that a peacefule society that is balanced in resources is the most enduring. But as history also notes, humans have been incapable, thus far, in doing so. We are inherently greedy, vindictive, and violent.
I also shake my head because we have the capacity to annihilate ourselves as we have never before to end life as we know it. And yet, we are unable to change. Because we are inherently greedy, vindictive, and violent.
You see, it takes an effort to choose good and be good. Really not much of one, but effort nonetheless. Evil is simple; it is practiced without effort. And I mean evil to be include those who practice the art of greed and violence. One must choose NOT to act malevolently.
Even neglecting to attempt to contemplate the possibility that your actions could have a negative impact on another is far more common than exhibiting regard for others.
If we allow others to act in this manner, without retribution, then we will destroy our global civilization and either start from the basics, or not begin again at all. I'm really starting to believe that it will be the latter.
Sometimes, I just shake my head.
Friday, September 12, 2008
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Family First
I'm sure this has probably already been mentioned but this particular situation boils down to a basic premise here: family first. As a parent we do have certain responsibilities that take precedence over others and, imo, family comes first over 'career', otherwise don't have children.
This is an obvious infraction of common sense and raising her children with honesty and an open mind. Sex education isn't about "abstinence only" aka "don't ask, don't tell". As adults whether we like it or not, are responsible for giving our children ALL of the information as we know it and teach them how to make wise decisions. That requires BEING THERE!
Country first? It's starts in the home.
Then, if that isn't enough, the last thing a sane, caring parent would want is a shotgun wedding for her daughter, especially to a young man who is clearly not mature enough to handle this situation in privacy let alone across the pages of our history books.
It's really not about the pregnancy, it's about how Sarah (you know, the parent?) is dealing with it now, and it doesn't really look good to me! Five children? I have a strong suspicion this 17 year old has been raising her siblings for some time. And a special needs infant? Ummm....that requires some dedicated parenting from BOTH parents! And just where is hubby in all of this? But, I digress...
What have we come to? Who's business is it really? Again, imo, if a situation doesn't directly affect you, and that situation is between two (or more) consenting adults, or parents of 'wayward' children who must help guide them to become sensible adults, it's really non of your business. I don't even care if you're trying to get a little in a bathroom stall! (I do draw a serious line at any direct/indirect solicitation or impact on minor and/or dependent children). Or someone who had an extra-martial affair? That really should have stayed within the bounds of those who were affected.
But again, I digress.
Simply: family first.
This is an obvious infraction of common sense and raising her children with honesty and an open mind. Sex education isn't about "abstinence only" aka "don't ask, don't tell". As adults whether we like it or not, are responsible for giving our children ALL of the information as we know it and teach them how to make wise decisions. That requires BEING THERE!
Country first? It's starts in the home.
Then, if that isn't enough, the last thing a sane, caring parent would want is a shotgun wedding for her daughter, especially to a young man who is clearly not mature enough to handle this situation in privacy let alone across the pages of our history books.
It's really not about the pregnancy, it's about how Sarah (you know, the parent?) is dealing with it now, and it doesn't really look good to me! Five children? I have a strong suspicion this 17 year old has been raising her siblings for some time. And a special needs infant? Ummm....that requires some dedicated parenting from BOTH parents! And just where is hubby in all of this? But, I digress...
What have we come to? Who's business is it really? Again, imo, if a situation doesn't directly affect you, and that situation is between two (or more) consenting adults, or parents of 'wayward' children who must help guide them to become sensible adults, it's really non of your business. I don't even care if you're trying to get a little in a bathroom stall! (I do draw a serious line at any direct/indirect solicitation or impact on minor and/or dependent children). Or someone who had an extra-martial affair? That really should have stayed within the bounds of those who were affected.
But again, I digress.
Simply: family first.
Labels:
2008 Election,
Palin,
parenthood,
Republican Party
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)